I'm starting to think that my browser is not showing correctly what you are writing to me. ![:)]( "Smiler")
This is an Anunnaki conspiracy, no other way.
I still don't understand why you call Regexpsubstitute - @include. But at least now I understand what you were trying to tell me. For the help in the analysis, thank you.
I would talk about regexpsubstitute only. I don't understand at all how this is related to @include.
Apparently there is some inconsistency in terminology.
This is an Anunnaki conspiracy, no other way.I still don't understand why you call Regexpsubstitute - @include. But at least now I understand what you were trying to tell me. For the help in the analysis, thank you.
I would talk about regexpsubstitute only. I don't understand at all how this is related to @include.
Apparently there is some inconsistency in terminology.
Statistics: Posted by Kotofanchik — Today, 4:25 am